|
Pioneer CLD-1010 The Pioneer CLD-1010 was the last in the so-called "1-grand player line-up". At the time of its introduction, the Pioneer LaserDisc brand of VideoDisc players consisted of a single, top-of-the-line player, and a lower cost, less full-featured player. Released in the same model year were the Pioneer LD-838D and the introduction of the Pioneer Elite LD-S1 which retailed for a cool $2500. After the CLD-1010 was discontinued, Pioneer adopted a new concept of LaserDisc players covering a range of features and pricing structures. The next series were labeled the CLD-x030 players. The players ran the price gamut and had different features and performance. The CLD-1010 was the first Pioneer player to play the then new, Compact Disc Video 5 inch format. This was a misguided attempt by Philips to rename the WHOLE LD format to associate it with the hugely successful CD. The 5 inch CD-V was a regular, gold colored (just color, not real gold) CD that, in addition to 20 minutes of normal Compact Disc compatible music, contained a 5 minute (max) video clip. The funny thing is, Philips renaming of the format seems so hastily sprung on Pioneer and their engineers, that they didn't have time to really reengineer the player to take advantage of the CD-V format. In fact, the instruction manual doesn't even mention CD-V at all, and a single slip of paper was thrown in the box titled, How to Play CD with Video Discs. The front of the player shows a similar haste, with CD with Video Capability quickly silkscreened on in place of the 2x Over Sampling Digital Filter blurb. In all aspects, you can tell that the adoption of CD-V capability was truly a last minute decision. Along the lines of "lasts", this was also the very last player to feature separate LaserDisc and Compact Disc turntables. Like the CLD-909, the CLD-1010 has the regular LD turntable, and further back, tucked underneath the laser slider, is a small, CD spindle/turntable. When a CD is inserted, the laser pickup moves to the back along with a section of the drawer, and the CD motor swings up into place. After this player, all combi LD/CD players used a single motor for both CD and LD playback. The CLD-1010 is a totally solid state player with a CCD Time Base Corrector. It also incorporates the same, superior analog video noise reduction circuitry that is contained in the LD-W1 and the Pioneer Elite LD-S1. The laser uses the Accu-Focus system, and achieves a .55 micron laser spot for 420 lines of resolution. In addition, the LaserRF amp is attached directly to the pickup, for RF-noise rejection. The player also incorporates Video Noise Coring, that eliminates video noise (snow) in dark parts of the picture. This helps tremendously with imperfectly pressed CLV/CAA Extended Play titles. One extra special aspect of the CLD-1010, and what sets it apart from all other Solid State LD players, either before or since, is its Laser Diode uses a RED laser of 6228 Angstroms. No other LD player or CD player with a Diode Laser has used a red laser. Red Lasers are VERY expensive and difficult to produce. But, they achieve an incredibly tight beam, and have excellent noise rejection. Plus, the red color of the laser makes most scratches and blemishes on the surface of the disc invisible to the photo diode system. Strangely, Pioneer never talked about this feature nor did they promote it. The CLD-1010 incorporates a Tilt Servo Laser Pickup and crosstalk rejection software to eliminate crosstalk on CLV/CAA (Extended Play) discs. About the only problem it has is dealing with defects (easily correctable) such as finger prints. I don't know why it can cope with scratches and other problems, but cant deal with fingerprints. As a CD player, it's not the best tracker on dirty discs. Still, this cant be considered much of a problem, because if you have a dirty disc, you should clean it, and you should be ashamed of treating your discs so badly! (lecture over!) The CLD-1010, as with all diode players, scans to either CHAPTER 0 or FRAME 0 to start playback. Chapter searches and frame searches are quite speedy. Digital Audio reproduction is superb, and the 2X over sampling digital filter gives a clean, clear high-end, with none of the phase shift of Pioneers earlier players that incorporated brick wall analog filters. With each successive generation of Pioneer LaserDisc player, the analog FM audio seems to get worse. The sound is pumped in the midrange, giving voices and music a "cardboard" or "boxy" quality. Extreme treble is rolled off substantially, making it sound like bad FM radio. Deep bass is also noticeably absent, with the upper bass range, 80 Hz or so, emphasized. Voices take on a chesty character. This applies even to modern, CX encoded soundtracks. When listening to an audio commentary popular on many disc, the audio is acceptable. Make sure you check out the CD to LD platter switching. If the belt breaks, the player can become stuck in one mode or the other. This isn't a big problem, as a new belt will fix it, but it is something to be aware of. If you are in the market for a used LD/CD player. you can't go wrong with the CLD-1010. Review PIO
|
‘-‘
key |
Screen
Display |
Speed |
‘+’
key |
|
X 3 |
3 times
play mode speed |
|
|
X 2 |
2 times
play mode speed |
|
|
X 1 |
Same
times play mode speed |
|
|
1 / 2 |
Half
times play mode speed |
|
|
1 / 4 |
Quarter
times play mode speed |
|
|
1 / 8 |
Eighth
times play mode speed |
|
|
1/ 16 |
Sixteenth
3 times play mode speed |
|
|
Step 1 |
Plays
one frame every second |
|
|
Step 3 |
Plays
one frame every three seconds |
|
A
programming option is included that will work with LV Chapters and CD Tracks.
Up to 10 can be entered in the program, though the TV screen will only
display (in LV mode) four of the entries. When
you enter more than four the earliest entry, while still recorded, is scrolled
off-screen to accommodate the latest one. With CDs the player does not recognise
Index points. (On CDs the term
“Track" relates to that of "Chapter”
on LV, but there is also another access level on CDs called
"Index” that is used for further sub-divisions of Tracks.) Some players
recognise Index points, but
Above:
Diagram
of the internal workings showing two motor spindles.
the 1050 is oblivious to such disc enhancements (as are the majority of companies involved in releasing CDs!). With CD-V Clips the player can offer most every function relevant to either audio or video. But it draws the line at a programme sequence combining the two i.e. you can program a series of audio tracks on a Clip disc, but you can’t insert the video track in the middle of the sequence. You can only switch between video and audio manually. Jumping from the audio to the video (and vice versa) is done by pushing the Search/Memo button.
Above: On
screen programming graphics
There
are no video specs quoted in the accompanying instruction booklet - this is a
typical omission with Pioneer instructions.
They only ever state a selection of audio specs; never the video ones.
A verbal mention of 440 lines horizontal resolution was made, and in
comparison with the PHILIPS 600/700 players (that constitute the largest
user-base, and subsequently most well-known standard of picture performance, in
the UK) the CLD-1050 is significantly sharper, plus exhibiting less noise in
both luminance and chroma elements of the picture.
(In other words there is less turbulence and grain to the picture and
much less 'bittiness' to the colour). It’s
a better picture all round and you'll notice discs showing a sparkle and
brightness unseen on any previous consumer PAL player.
One of
the shortcomings of the original PHILIPS players (and all the helium-neon laser
LV players encountered) occurs with dark scenes that manifest a milky
streakiness over dark areas of the picture.
The LD-700 was a major improvement and produced a near transparent image
in this respect, but the 1050 does not (with this review sample at least) manage
quite the same performance. (Though
it would have been nice to do a side by side comparison to make sure - the
memory can be a mite unreliable). On
the 1050 there is some low-level streaking that one wonders might be
intentional. The LD-700 was a very
severe judge of flawed disc pressings, showing up blemishes people just didn't
believe existed. The 1050 seems to
have surpassed the picture performance of the LD-700 in virtually every area,
without revealing the same level of pressing defects, and there may be some
connection between these two factors. A
personal preference would be a completely transparent picture - and completely
clean disc pressings to go with them!
A new
player means it’s time to get out the reference discs.
These are an odd bunch of titles. As
regards the discs originated on 35mm film they are not ideal transfers, being a
bit too contrasty, the result of being taken from regular cinema-contrast prints
rather than low-contrast prints or 'negatives.
Video cannot cope with the extended grey scale of photographic film, and
that's why such contrasty transfers are always unsatisfactory in respect of dark
scenes and outdoor shots in direct sunlight. However, film titles such as Ruckus, Hoodwink and 48
Hours' are all nice sharp transfers with strong colour that show much of the
potential of the LV format from the point of view of extended bandwidth.
For
video-originated test pieces the Splashin’ The Palace '84 and, with
particular relevance to German subscribers, the Friedrich Gulda Mozart for
the People discs are definitely worth trying on any new machine.
The Gidda discs are not that impressive overall, but for the shots from
one particular angle - the front-face closeups - that are quite spectacular ~
what they show can be achieved on a domestic video format. There is no noise m
the picture and the skin tones are immaculate (although the disc pressing IWYCS
something to be desired).
As an
aside, readers concerned to assess the quality of their players and TVs are
recommended to acquire one or two of these discs. Ruckus is a cheap disc
and probably the best, Hoodwink almost as good.
If these discs don't look substantially sharper than any other film
titles you have then a new TV is in order!
The Splashin’ At The Palace '84 is also fairly cheap and
has the added bonus of good sound (good picture and sound - on the same disc!).
Although it has departed these shelves some time past, the David Essex Albert
Hall disc lingers in the memory as another impressively sharp
video-originated disc that is available cheap.
It is not
necessary, though, to have the above mentioned discs to notice the improvement
in picture quality with the 1050 - the reduction in chroma noise will show on
virtually every disc, giving a much more vivid colour signal without any
accompanying break-up. More than
likely the limiting factor to how much difference you notice with the picture
will come down to the performance of your picture tube.
With the 1050
the 'problem' with heavy reds and blues is still not resolved. The player makes a better job of coping with these colours,
but still not to the preferred "perfectness". One other characteristic still present is one that we don't
have a precise definition for.
LV
players confronted with certain hues of red and blue respond by resorting to
displaying a finely-textured 'S' patterning down the screen on the saturated
colour. You don't notice it greatly
on the older players because they don't resolve fine detail so well (but you can
see it if you know where to look!). It
was a more noticeable problem with the LD-700 and still persists with the 1050.
A good example of the characteristic is on the Chiris Barter Band disc
that has a dominant blue background running throughout the programme.
When it goes a certain hue the patterning becomes quite noticeable.
Some people find this distracting and it would be nice to see it
eliminated eventually.
Essentially
though, the CLD-1050 is a step forward in picture quality in all but the one
respect of the transparency of dark areas of the picture, and for the reasons
stated, one is tempted to contemplate the possibility of this being a deliberate
tweak. We couldn't find a disc to
show up any crosstalk whatsoever - the player tracked everything with ease (and
with extreme mechanical silence). Even
a 'nicely' warped specimen (that the 600 can just about track only at the
expense of losing colour synch) played faultlessly on the 1050 without any
audible murmur from the tracking mechanism.
Just to
round off the point about mechanical noise of the player, it's fair comment to
say that, as far as aural distraction from the workings of the machine is
concerned, you can just about forget it. Even
with CAV discs (that are always running at top speed) the noise level is
extremely low. These comments apply
for a player within arms length of the viewing position (i.e. very close - why
get up to change discs?). Even the new Clip CDs, where the motor is thrashing
away at up to 2250rpm, it was very quiet. Surprisingly,
when the player was moved across the room to a position next to the TV, the whir
of CD-V Clips did then become audible -but this was when there was no sound
output from the speakers. (By the way, have you been thinking your hearing has been
declining this last year or two because your old VP600/700 doesn't appear to be
making as much noise as it used to. Well,
it's probably not a case of failing faculties but the improvement in the disc
pressings these recent years that don't put such heavy demands on the hardware.
The players are just as noisy when you put an old pressing on, especially
if it's warped or has a lot of dropout.)
The
audio improvement with analogue LV discs is significant - if flawed; the range
is greater, with deeper and better-defined bass and similarly clearer and more
extended high frequencies. Discs
sound less strained than before. There
is a price to pay for this, which may be too high, though.
The player is very unforgiving to pressing dropouts (as far as they
affect the audio signal) and all manner of previously 'acceptable' titles begin
to manifest the odd pop and crackle where before there sounded to be nothing.
Some discs manage a fairly consistent low-level spitting which will sound
familiar to some readers as a criticism often levelled at German-pressed discs. Such German discs are even more severely affected by the
clearer audio reproduction which, considering where the player is going on sale
first, makes for the worst possible clash of events. No very recent
German-pressed discs were on hand to pursue the matter further. The
UK-mastered-but-Germ an-pressed titles we've recently been getting seemed
better, but these may not be a good comparison.
The player is
certainly very revealing of the usual sound defects that crop up on film
transfers. A Room with A View managed a few extra passages that showed
distortion of various sorts and The Colour Purple, with its quivering
treble, became more than uncomfortable to listen to for any sustained period.
This is actually a good sign for the fidelity of the player, but practically it
is showing up our film transfers. It made sense to try a CX-encoded title to see
whether the spitting carried through to such discs; it does.
Only the Naze/Happy Feelia's was available at the time, which is a
live recording and so little in the way of quiet passages occur, but the
spitting was there in a more noticeable way on the usually silent lead-in.
The most
significant improvement in the sound was the elimination of the low burble you
always get with LV discs. It has
cropped up on every PAL & NTSC player so far auditioned.
In the best examples it is not usually too intrusive, but it's always
there. (Just try putting on a disc
and turning up the volume on the lead-in, before any sound output proper comes
through the speakers.) For some
reason this audio distraction is no longer there on the 1050 - just a low (very
low) hum, set far further down in the audio signal and effectively of no
consequence in relation to the level of the analogue signal. This is good.
Let's
move onto the digital side of things. Digital
audio on PAL discs is similarly free of the burble that crops up on the early
NTSC players. The same burble you hear on analogue sound has tended to creep
into the digital audio of LV discs in NTSC.
You do really have to crank the volume up high to hear it, but the
digital track on NTSC audio has, so far, not been heard with the same clarity as
the players manage with CDs. It's as if the players can't eliminate some sort of
'beating' from the analogue video (or audio) signal - a problem that does not
occur (obviously) with sound only CDs. This
beating noise does not crop up on PAL digital sound discs, with this player
anyway.
For the
review, only a couple of live concert discs (Style Council/Showbiz and Level
42/Live At Wembley) and the Classics sampler was on hand for
audition, none of which one would ideally like to make judgements on. (Because
the first two have little in the way of 'silence' In them and are recorded under
non-studio conditions -well, not the Level 42 maybe, but who's to tell
what was dubbed in and what wasn't! - and samplers are always a bit suspect on
matters of fidelity. Additionally most of the sampler is analogue originated,
often quite vintage stuff.) Having said that one can make no major criticism of
the sound from the discs. There
were no distracting noises; the passages that were meant to be silent were.
The Level 42 disc had some apparent dropouts in a couple of songs
that seemed to be instrument failings on stage rather than in the recording or
the pressing.
Playing
a bunch of CDs proved a more reliable guide to the merits of digital audio.
Inspite of what the Golden Ears might try and tell you, some discs sound
great - even if others don't. The
1050 tracked every CD tried on it (including one we've found that mutes
momentarily on the Yamaha CLV-1) without fault.
In the time allowed for the review it did not prove possible to detect
significant differences between the 1050 (with its 16-bit, 2x oversampling) over
the earlier CLD-7 clone - which is without such increasingly popular output
stages. It’s very difficult to endorse the views of those who resist the move
to digital audio, even though there may be some theoretical advantages to the
old technology. Practical experience suggests that digital is better.
Recording engineers manage to screw up both.
The bottom line has to be the absence of noise - in all its
manifestations.
Just to
show openness to persuasion, though, this little test might brighten up the mood
of the 'Back To Analogue' brigade. The
three PAL digital discs we had, we had in both PAL and NTSC. So, although a
straight comparison between analogue and digital in PAL was not possible
(because there is no analogue track on the PAL disc), it was possible to run the
analogue track on the NTSC disc in synch with the digital PAL disc. A personal
judgement would tend to have favoured the analogue sound on the NTSC player as
the short excerpts from the Classics sampler were played through!
All those things you hear about digital being "tight, nasal, lacking
air" etc started to ring true. The analogue really did reveal a certain
sweetness and airiness that just didn't seem to be there on the PAL digital
disc. But, while still good
compared to standard quality PAL analogue discs, the analogue track was hissy
and noisy in comparison with the silent digital disc.
But then
it gets more complicated. The thunderous opening chords of the Othello excerpt,
and the PAL digital disc really opened up, leaving the analogue sounding wimpish
in comparison. The analogue track needed some volume boost to cope with its lost
dynamic, but even then it still sounded clouded and less exciting. When you go
into all the variables further it does, of course, become impossible to reach a
firm conclusion. For example, you can bet that the master tape for everything
started out in digital; the NTSC analogue sound also had to survive the
side-effects of the CX noise reduction; and how consistent would the two disc
transfers be anyway? That said, the exercise does make one aware of the supposed
loss of musicality that is supposed to occur with digital. Analogue does seem to
put a roundness to the sound (that may be no more than the ear being confused by
the ambient noise of the recording) that is absent on digital signals.
However, at the end of the trial, the long-term conclusion would have to
be to go with digital.
Not all
these timings will be that important to one's potential enjoyment of the player.
Some we do to monitor developments in the hardware, and others in response to
the apparent slowness or speed of operation. The CLD-1050 does seem a bit
sluggish dealing with Clip discs. If
you’ve just been playing a movie and decide to round the evening off with a
pop video the player needs just a bit longer to change motors and access the
video track on the CIip. It takes
26 seconds from the time you push Play and the open drawer commences its load
cycle. If you have already got the
CD motor in position (after playing a CD or another Clip) the time comes down to
20 seconds. Jumping from the video
track to the audio takes 9 seconds, switching back to the video from the audio
takes 12 seconds.
On a long
audio CD it takes about 6 seconds to do a Track Search to Track 27 (about 67
minutes of disc space). A Track
Search back to Track 1 is again about 6 seconds.
A Search to Track 10 en the same disc (about 46 minutes in) takes less
than 3 seconds; back to Track 1 again takes slightly longer, 4 seconds. (With these timings one is dependent on the exact positioning
of the Track mark on the disc in relation to the music start - the player is
actually slightly faster than these times would suggest.)
On an LV
disc in CAV, going from Frame 1 to Frame 54,000 in Search mode takes 7 seconds,
both directions. On a CLV disc a
Time Search to the 59.00 point took 13 seconds, 12 seconds when going back to
the start.
Side change
times on LV (i.e. the of the gap in the movie between end of side one till side
two can be up on screen) takes between 26 to 28 seconds depending on how
much of a you are. Dedicated
practice with player could probably trim a second so off this time. The
Scan speed of the player with LV discs is 40 seconds for a full side, start to
finish. This is a reasonable
compromise
between visibility and speed of access. Scan times are usually longer on
machines that have more comprehensive search facilities - and rightly so.
Putting
all this into some sort of conclusion is fairly easy.
There is only one aspect of the machine about which there is any
significant reservations -the noise on the analogue sound of LV discs.
This won’t matter much to the German buyers who come to the machine
without any previous involvement in LV and restrict their purchases to digital
discs. It's only those readers who
are sitting on a large library of analogue discs who are likely to be troubled
by this aspect of the machine, and ideally, should try and get to hear it
playing some of these discs before committing themselves to a purchase.
(It would have been nice to have got hold of another sample of the player
to be absolutely certain we weren't dealing with a sample fault, but this wasn't
possible.
Although the
CLD-1050 is our first PAL Combi player it does have to stand comparison with
previous NTSC ones -from both Pioneer and Yamaha.
The 1050 does not have quite the comprehensive control functions of the
Yamaha CLV-1, even though it does more than any previous PAL LV player.
In relation to CDs, some may find the 1050 a little short on facilities.
With the programming, for example, even if few people actually routinely
programme more than 10 tracks on a CD (even if, like the disc illustrated
opposite, they can easily have over 25 tracks) many cheap current dedicated CD
players offer twice the number of programme selections.
But essentially, the 1050 is an LV player that also plays CDs - not the
other way around.
It's an
easy machine to use, even if you don't fully understand all the various controls
first off. (The instruction manual is in German/English.) It's eminently
sensible to have the one machine to play all the discs presently available, and
even though the CD-V function is something that has been added during the
production run of this player, the machine copes quite well with it.
It could maybe have been just that bit more athletic in the speed of the
mechanical handling. The other
aspect of the machine's established run of production is that is has an assured
feel about it when undertaking any task. It may be new technology to this part
of the world, but it's fairly evident there are several years of accumulated
expertise behind its design.
Pioneer
CLD-1050 LV/CD/CD-V player, PAL 625 line standard
Price (in
Germany): DM. 1,998-.
Disc Types:
LV (20 & 3Ocm), CD Video (12cm), CD Audio (12cm).
Dimensions
420(w) x
120(h) x 41 1(d)mm.
Weight
11.5kg
Power
Consumption:
44 W.
Power 220/240 V (Switchable), 50/60Hz.
VIDEO
Output lVp-p
nominal, negative synch, terminated.
Impendance:
75 ohm unbalanced.
TV Output
PAL-C
(IEC jack).
Connections:
BNC, Scart/Euro(Composite).
Bandwidth:
440 lines, horizontal.
AUDIO
Connections:
Phono L&R, Scart.
Analogue
Output
200mVrms(1kHz,40%).
Digital
Output 200mVrms(1kHz, -20dB).
Digital
Audio Characteristics (EIAJ) -Frequency Response:
4-20k Hz (+0.51.0dB).
SIN
Ratio:
98db.
Dynamic
Range: 95dB.
Channel
Separation:
92dB.
Total
Harmonic Distortion:
0.005%.
Wow &
Flutter: +0.001% Weighted Peak or less.